Thursday, April 16, 2009

Napolitano is a Disgrace - Resign.

Janet Napolitano is a disgrace. resign.

After twisting the Department of Homeland Security into a Homeland State Police and insulting America's Veterans, Napolitano offered a smirk and an off-hand attempt to brush off her remarks and then added a confirmation of her mission to curb American Civil Rights.

"Let me be very clear: We monitor the risks of violent extremism taking root here in the United States," Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said in a written statement.

"We don't have the luxury of focusing our efforts on one group; we must protect the country from terrorism whether foreign or homegrown and regardless of the ideology that motivates its violence."

Resign, you hack!


Bert said...

I am not saying I agree with Napolitano whatsoever. However, please don’t pretend that there is no domestic threat.

The second largest terrorist attack in United States history was perpetrated by Timothy McVeigh, a right-wing extremist. McVeigh was revolting against a “tyrannical federal government”.

Over 800 people were injured in the attack and 168 lost there lives. Denying this is a disgrace to their memory.

pathickey said...


'However, please don’t pretend that there is no domestic threat.'

You got this right alright. GDs, Mikey Cobras. Vice Lords, Travelling Vice Lords, Latin Kings, and the Stones sure are a genuine domestic threats, but they somehow managed to stay off of Big Sis's Radar - McVeigh stamps all Veterans for this hack.

Bert said...

Are gangs considered domestic terrorists? Should they be? Maybe. But as it stands the goal of most gangs is not to (directly) bring down the United States government.

The goal of McVeigh was just that. The fact that McVeigh was a Veteran is of no matter.

pathickey said...

'But as it stands the goal of most gangs is not to (directly) bring down the United States government.'

Nope, that is the goal of UICC Education professor and veteran domestic terrorist Billy Ayers.

Gangbangers are more akin to Somali Pirates.

Bert said...

OK. Glad to see you don't miss the chance to take a swipe at Obama. If what's-his-name had won the presidential race I might do the same thing.

Back to the point- Timothy McVeigh perpetrated the second largest terrorist attack on American soil. He took more American lives than our golden hoop earring wearing buddy Billy Ayers.

Any Homeland Security director needs to consider that.

pathickey said...

Bart a slap at Billy Ayers is a slap at Obama? Boy, you are hooked.

McCain shot off his own foot - he did not want the job, in my opinion. So, you were never going to have that opportunity.

As for the President, he has a no cut contract for four years.

I have a feeling that he will want to do exactly what McCain did. In fact, he may decide to resign down the pike. Maybe not, but it would not surprise me.

North Korea pimped slapped him repeatedly - tday they expelled the U.N. Inspectors; The Pirates ditto - thank God for the eyes on those SEAls and NOW the President is off to get a 'fresh one' from Hugo Chavez.

Barack Obama's ambitions got him what he wanted. He is Our President. President Obama might have been better served with a few years building a resume.

BillyFish said...

McVeigh was a Monarch! Infiltrated into the miltia movement. When they have the big school shooting that is planned for next week, maybe you will all wake up!

pathickey said...

Billy Fish,

I had read that some time ago and had forgotten all about that Mkultura/Delta Force connection.

Reaganite Republican Resistance said...

Napolitano's use of the 1995 Oklahoma City attack as an example of why US military veterans are supposedly a threat to us all certainly is intriguing-

That bombing was a single event, almost 14 years ago- hasn't Al Qaida staged hundreds of attacks on US interests since then? Why so little mention of them since she was appointed three months ago- isn't keeping a lid on those medieval savages 80% of her job description? Isn't that why the Department of Homeland Security created in the first-place?

Apparently there is no bounds to what government assets Obama will prostitute for his own purposes… while neglecting daunting, actual threats in the meantime.

So all who wondered why Obama chose this obedient toady to head Homeland Security now have their answer: a serious choice who would have focused upon real terrorist threats -not imaginary, partisan ones- like, say, a Rudolph Giuliani, wouldn't have been a willing participant in such a sham report.