tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8978152.post3329005145428627214..comments2023-10-18T05:38:08.545-07:00Comments on . . . With Both Hands: Thomas Aquinas Over Stephen Hawking - Mark Rhoads, Loyola Man Sets Things Right!pathickeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01051997614374510451noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8978152.post-19658556236951790262011-08-28T19:38:49.345-07:002011-08-28T19:38:49.345-07:00PHILOSOPHIA PERENNIS.
The Old Lady’s TORTOISE (Hi...PHILOSOPHIA PERENNIS.<br /><br />The Old Lady’s TORTOISE (Hinduism) and DRAGON (Taoism) are symbols for WAVE (energy), both are analog with MAGEN DAVID (Judaism). "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" is the metaphor, and also similar with allegory of rituals Thawaf circling around the Ka'ba and Sa’i oscillating along “the sinus” Marwah-Shafa (seven times) during the Hajj pilgrimage (Abraham). CROSS (Christian) and SWASTIKA (Buddhism) are symbols for “Balance of Nature.”<br /><br />"A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME - From the Big Bang to Black Hole" by Stephen W. Hawking is the best scientific interpretation of AL QUR'AN by a non believer. It is a “test case” and also a “genuine bridge stone” for comprehensive study of Theology. Surprise, this paradox is a miracle and blessing in disguise as well. It should be very wise and challenging for Moslem scholars and others to verify my discovery, for then we should know the Mind of GOD.<br /> <br />I am just “ordinary people,” so would you mind correcting my point of view. Thank you.<br /><br />Please, see pictures: http://neosufi-tato.blogspot.comNeoSUFI.Tatohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02090233313869415998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8978152.post-76718843414640869402011-07-12T05:52:09.980-07:002011-07-12T05:52:09.980-07:00IMHO, Hawking deliberately misses the easiest path...IMHO, Hawking deliberately misses the easiest path of all to proving that God does not exist - proving that there is no such thing as human consciousness. As I understand Hawking's proof, he says, "If you grant me my source of the Big Bang, I can take it all from there."<br /><br />If you can go with Hawking that way, a far, far simpler statement is this: "I already know the origin of human life - it is the fertilization of an egg. I can take it all from there." By doing this, Hawking destroys God because he turns you, me and him into automatons. There's no point to God without free will. In fact, it doesn't matter if He exists or not since there's nothing we can do about it.<br /><br />So why doesn't he go this easier route? Because he's not interested in discussing God, per se. He likes being on TV and talking to people like Larry King while being treated royally. If he truly believed in what he's saying, he would know that it's a total waste of time. He's just one arbitrary sack of subatomic particles talking to another arbitrary sack of subatomic particles.<br /><br />What do you think of that?<br /><br />Thanks for posting this. I'll be popping back over to read more of your blog. Stop by <a href="http://ktcatspost.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">The Scratching Post</a> some time and let me know what you think of my ramblings.K T Cathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10259428595745509790noreply@blogger.com